Comments for Politics. News. Analysis. Humor. http://andrewaxsom.wordpress.com Wed, 09 Jul 2008 01:27:33 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=MU Comment on Obama a pervert? by nurzratchetz http://andrewaxsom.wordpress.com/2008/02/21/obama-a-pervert/#comment-244 nurzratchetz Thu, 26 Jun 2008 06:40:59 +0000 http://andrewaxsom.wordpress.com/?p=9#comment-244 I really encourage everyone who has any questions whatsoever, to go to this Sinclair's website (larrysinclair0926 dot wordpress dot com) and spend a few entertaining minutes trying to find any proof with any merit whatsoever. Now that might sound like it's about as much fun as a nailgun to the nutsack, so let me just reassure you that it's VERY entertaining to read what these cult members say, and I can confidently promise you that you won't be coming after me asking for that hour of your life back. After you fail to find anything legitimate, as I'm sure you will if you have any understanding of what constitutes reasonable proof, please please please try to ask for more details or a confirmation on some point (any point), or just try to engage Sinclair in any conversation whatsoever. And then, you will see with completely clarity, that this guy is nothing more than a nutcase running yet another (though somewhat incomprehensible) scam on those without sufficient mental defenses to screen out such nonsense. I really encourage everyone who has any questions whatsoever, to go to this Sinclair’s website (larrysinclair0926 dot wordpress dot com) and spend a few entertaining minutes trying to find any proof with any merit whatsoever.

Now that might sound like it’s about as much fun as a nailgun to the nutsack, so let me just reassure you that it’s VERY entertaining to read what these cult members say, and I can confidently promise you that you won’t be coming after me asking for that hour of your life back.

After you fail to find anything legitimate, as I’m sure you will if you have any understanding of what constitutes reasonable proof, please please please try to ask for more details or a confirmation on some point (any point), or just try to engage Sinclair in any conversation whatsoever.

And then, you will see with completely clarity, that this guy is nothing more than a nutcase running yet another (though somewhat incomprehensible) scam on those without sufficient mental defenses to screen out such nonsense.

]]> Comment on Obama a pervert? by nurzratchetz http://andrewaxsom.wordpress.com/2008/02/21/obama-a-pervert/#comment-243 nurzratchetz Thu, 26 Jun 2008 06:40:15 +0000 http://andrewaxsom.wordpress.com/?p=9#comment-243 Larry Sinclair has thus far failed to produce a single viable piece of evidence, yet is continuing to take advantage of every media outlet and communication medium in an attempt to extort money from Senator Obama. He has staged phoney press conferences, started numerous blogs, contacted all mainstream media outlets with his flimsy and fundamentally unverifiable accusations. Is it any wonder nobody in the mainstream media wants to risk their career and credibility covering this farce? Legally and morally, the burden is on Sinclair to prove his allegations, not on Obama to disprove them. Larry Sinclair knows this, but he is banking (quite literally) on the fact that the court of public opinion operates quite differently than a court of law, and isn't making any substantial effort to prove his accusations. He knows that it's hard to prove you DIDN'T do something, and is rallying the ignorant under this pretense to send him contributions (and any other number of other 'fundraising' activities of questionable legality). He's got them so worked up to such a fever pitch that several of them are posting threats on his blog (larrysinclair0926.wordpress.com) to kill Obama if he gets elected. Larry Sinclair has thus far failed to produce a single viable piece of evidence, yet is continuing to take advantage of every media outlet and communication medium in an attempt to extort money from Senator Obama. He has staged phoney press conferences, started numerous blogs, contacted all mainstream media outlets with his flimsy and fundamentally unverifiable accusations. Is it any wonder nobody in the mainstream media wants to risk their career and credibility covering this farce?

Legally and morally, the burden is on Sinclair to prove his allegations, not on Obama to disprove them. Larry Sinclair knows this, but he is banking (quite literally) on the fact that the court of public opinion operates quite differently than a court of law, and isn’t making any substantial effort to prove his accusations.

He knows that it’s hard to prove you DIDN’T do something, and is rallying the ignorant under this pretense to send him contributions (and any other number of other ‘fundraising’ activities of questionable legality). He’s got them so worked up to such a fever pitch that several of them are posting threats on his blog (larrysinclair0926.wordpress.com) to kill Obama if he gets elected.

]]> Comment on Obama a pervert? by WeR1 http://andrewaxsom.wordpress.com/2008/02/21/obama-a-pervert/#comment-242 WeR1 Wed, 25 Jun 2008 05:58:50 +0000 http://andrewaxsom.wordpress.com/?p=9#comment-242 Bunch of fucking racists bigots. I pray to God when Obama becomes Presidents he ships your asses to a 3rd world country where you belong. Bunch of fucking racists bigots. I pray to God when Obama becomes Presidents he ships your asses to a 3rd world country where you belong.

]]> Comment on Obama’s Commie Blogger by Stacy http://andrewaxsom.wordpress.com/2008/04/26/obamas-commie-blogger/#comment-241 Stacy Sun, 22 Jun 2008 12:03:56 +0000 http://andrewaxsom.wordpress.com/?p=90#comment-241 I absolutely agree with Wayne. I absolutely agree with Wayne.

]]> Comment on Obama’s Commie Blogger by forenoon http://andrewaxsom.wordpress.com/2008/04/26/obamas-commie-blogger/#comment-240 forenoon Tue, 03 Jun 2008 01:41:30 +0000 http://andrewaxsom.wordpress.com/?p=90#comment-240 Forenoon says : I absolutely agree with this ! Forenoon says : I absolutely agree with this !

]]> Comment on Obama a pervert? by mudac http://andrewaxsom.wordpress.com/2008/02/21/obama-a-pervert/#comment-239 mudac Thu, 29 May 2008 19:09:41 +0000 http://andrewaxsom.wordpress.com/?p=9#comment-239 Yes. There is a very factual arguement by mister Sinclair. http://mudac.wordpress.com/2008/05/29/larry-sinclair-is-in-dc/ Yes. There is a very factual arguement by mister Sinclair. http://mudac.wordpress.com/2008/05/29/larry-sinclair-is-in-dc/

]]> Comment on Ron Paul on Steroids. by Eddie http://andrewaxsom.wordpress.com/2008/04/17/ron-paul-on-steroids/#comment-237 Eddie Tue, 06 May 2008 01:44:56 +0000 http://andrewaxsom.wordpress.com/?p=86#comment-237 Tossing a white rag for McCain.. Call it quits bud.. Tossing a white rag for McCain.. Call it quits bud..

]]> Comment on Obama’s Commie Blogger by Wayne McLain http://andrewaxsom.wordpress.com/2008/04/26/obamas-commie-blogger/#comment-235 Wayne McLain Mon, 28 Apr 2008 02:17:24 +0000 http://andrewaxsom.wordpress.com/?p=90#comment-235 After reading this I have to wonder exactly what is the purpose of this article. Is it to debase Barack Obama since he employs someone who does not share the same party affiliation? Or perhaps it is simply to “make people think”? Regardless, there is little value in either approach. In 1945 the Labour Party gained control in the UK and was afraid that the bureaucrats that were hired by the previous regime would stymie any effort to enforce any substantial new legislation. However, against expectations, the civil service performed their duties with professionalism. Who is to say that Mr. Graham-Felsen would not do the same? Nowhere does the article claim that he is doing shoddy work or that he is incapable of competently performing that which he is hired to do. The only accusation is that he is a Marxist, which is neither illegal nor a reason to assume that he cannot be loyal to Obama in his capacity as Obama’s employee. While it might be argued that it would be preferable to employ people that are in complete agreement with your objectives and methodology, this is a matter of personal discretion. In other words, this matter is between Obama and Graham-Felsen. As to simply making one think, it begs the question of what it is that this article is supposed to make us “think” about. Quite simply, it would seem that the direction this article wants to guide our thoughts in is exactly what I previously refuted: that Obama is somehow less worthy of our votes because he employs a Marxist. This article is nothing more than an attempt to use the vestiges of the Communist boogey to sow doubt upon those that might vote for Obama. After reading this I have to wonder exactly what is the purpose of this article. Is it to debase Barack Obama since he employs someone who does not share the same party affiliation? Or perhaps it is simply to “make people think”? Regardless, there is little value in either approach.
In 1945 the Labour Party gained control in the UK and was afraid that the bureaucrats that were hired by the previous regime would stymie any effort to enforce any substantial new legislation. However, against expectations, the civil service performed their duties with professionalism. Who is to say that Mr. Graham-Felsen would not do the same? Nowhere does the article claim that he is doing shoddy work or that he is incapable of competently performing that which he is hired to do. The only accusation is that he is a Marxist, which is neither illegal nor a reason to assume that he cannot be loyal to Obama in his capacity as Obama’s employee. While it might be argued that it would be preferable to employ people that are in complete agreement with your objectives and methodology, this is a matter of personal discretion. In other words, this matter is between Obama and Graham-Felsen.
As to simply making one think, it begs the question of what it is that this article is supposed to make us “think” about. Quite simply, it would seem that the direction this article wants to guide our thoughts in is exactly what I previously refuted: that Obama is somehow less worthy of our votes because he employs a Marxist. This article is nothing more than an attempt to use the vestiges of the Communist boogey to sow doubt upon those that might vote for Obama.

]]> Comment on Obama a pervert? by Expose http://andrewaxsom.wordpress.com/2008/02/21/obama-a-pervert/#comment-234 Expose Sun, 27 Apr 2008 20:26:37 +0000 http://andrewaxsom.wordpress.com/?p=9#comment-234 Obama is not to be trusted! He should be worried about his DNA . . . that is out there. He is a wonderful speaker . . . silver tongued fox. Down deep the man has issues and all reality is nothing but a typical black man on the down low that enjoys oral sex while smoking or snorting. Obama is not to be trusted! He should be worried about his DNA . . . that is out there. He is a wonderful speaker . . . silver tongued fox. Down deep the man has issues and all reality is nothing but a typical black man on the down low that enjoys oral sex while smoking or snorting.

]]> Comment on Another crack at a national ID card by Nick http://andrewaxsom.wordpress.com/2008/04/08/another-crack-at-a-national-id-card/#comment-223 Nick Mon, 21 Apr 2008 06:20:05 +0000 http://andrewaxsom.wordpress.com/?p=69#comment-223 Hi Andrew, Thanks for this story. As one of Mark Kirk's constituents from the IL-10th Congressional district, I wanted to comment. Kirk has been a strong proponent of REAL ID for quite awhile now. Observing Kirk over the past few years, I strongly believe Kirk's real reason for the new SS card (and the National ID card) is not National Security, but connecting the right to vote with the REAL ID. It has been an open secret that this "right to vote-REAL ID" link is a cherished goal of the national Republican party (Republicans tried to pass a law to accomplish this a few years ago when they controlled Congress). Studies have shown that making this link the law of the land will disenfranchise millions of low income and elderly voters--just the kind of voters Republicans want off the voter rolls. Kirk is also great friends with John McCain. I'm sure they will campaign together this summer and fall. I'm also sure that McCain is in favor of REAL ID. If you are against REAL ID, PLEASE consider voting against McCain. If McCain is elected President, REAL ID will be that much closer to a reality. You can bet on it. Hi Andrew,

Thanks for this story. As one of Mark Kirk’s constituents from the IL-10th Congressional district, I wanted to comment.

Kirk has been a strong proponent of REAL ID for quite awhile now. Observing Kirk over the past few years, I strongly believe Kirk’s real reason for the new SS card (and the National ID card) is not National Security, but connecting the right to vote with the REAL ID.

It has been an open secret that this “right to vote-REAL ID” link is a cherished goal of the national Republican party (Republicans tried to pass a law to accomplish this a few years ago when they controlled Congress). Studies have shown that making this link the law of the land will disenfranchise millions of low income and elderly voters–just the kind of voters Republicans want off the voter rolls.

Kirk is also great friends with John McCain. I’m sure they will campaign together this summer and fall.

I’m also sure that McCain is in favor of REAL ID. If you are against REAL ID, PLEASE consider voting against McCain. If McCain is elected President, REAL ID will be that much closer to a reality. You can bet on it.

]]>